TN9606A - Guria V4 File Transfer Speeds

Vaughan Wesson, June 1996

With larger amounts of storage becoming more common on Kelunji Classic recorders, file transfer speed has become more of an issue recently. Guria V4.10A considerably improved this over previous versions and V4.11A has improved it again. The other issue is the system (both hardware and software) receiving the file. As is shown below, this is probably the most important aspect.

The tables below indicate the speed at which useful data (i.e. not counting block headers, checksums etc) is transferred from a Kelunji Classic to a Macintosh computer. Variations in baud rate, file transfer protocol, Macintosh software and Macintosh hardware are covered.

Guria Versions

This first table shows the variation in file transfer speed over the last few versions of Guria. All these tests were performed on a Macintosh PM7100/66AV using ZTerm 1.01. The Guria V4.09A figures were the best possible with that version, using a KA2 and 64 samples per second.

Guria
Version
Baud
Rate
Transfer
Mode
Bytes/
Second
Minutes/
Megabyte
V4.09A
9600
128 byte
760
23.0
V4.10A
9600
128 byte
785
22.3
V4.11A
9600
128 byte
775
22.6
V4.09A
19200
128 byte
765
23.0
V4.10A
19200
128 byte
1330
13.1
V4.11A
19200
128 byte
1325
13.2
V4.09A
38400
128 byte
765
23.0
V4.10A
38400
128 byte
1620
10.8
V4.11A
38400
128 byte
1645
10.6
V4.09A
9600
1K block
665
26.3
V4.10A
9600
1K block
895
19.5
V4.11A
9600
1K block
900
19.4
V4.09A
19200
1K block
665
26.2
V4.10A
19200
1K block
1190
14.7
V4.11A
19200
1K block
1410
12.4
V4.09A
38400
1K block
665
26.2
V4.10A
38400
1K block
1185
14.8
V4.11A
38400
1K block
1920
9.1

In summary, this table shows that the fastest transfers possible are:

Computer End

This second table shows the variation in file transfer speed for the different terminal emulator programs and computer system. All these tests were performed on using Guria V4.11A and 1K block transfers. Similar results were obtained for 128 byte block transfers.

Emulator
Computer
Baud
Rate
Bytes/
Second
Minutes/
Megabyte
ZTerm 1.01
PM 7100/66
38400
1920
9.1
ZTerm 1.01
PowerBook 170
38400
1920
9.1
MacTerminal 3.0
PM 7100/66
38400
1900
9.2
Mac340 Comms
PM 7100/66
38400
218
80
Mac340 Comms
PowerBook 170
38400
480
37
ZTerm 1.01
PM 7100/66
9600
875
20.0
ZTerm 1.01
PowerBook 170
9600
895
19.5
MacTerminal 3.0
PM 7100/66
9600
880
19.8
Mac340 Comms
PM 7100/66
9600
235
75
Mac340 Comms
PowerBook 170
9600
485
36
Mac340 Serial
PM 7100/66
9600
-
-
Mac340 Serial
PowerBook 170
9600
-
-

In summary this table shows that on a PowerMac, Mac340 is horribly slow - twice as slow as a PowerBook 170. In either case, Mac340 is considerably slower at transferring files than either ZTerm or MacTerminal (the Apple freeware emulator).


Copyright © 1998, Seismology Research Centre
Last modified: 2006-11-09